The correlational study is aimed at validating the Authenticity Scale in Russian culture. Authenticity is considered a trait responsible for a person’s ability to be oneself. It helps people resist environment pressure and prevent self-alienation, which contributes to maintaining psychological wellbeing. The original Authenticity Scale includes three subscales: Authentic Living, Accepting External Influence, and Self-Alienation. In total, 2,188 respondents (M_years = , SD_age = ; 78.1% female) participated in the survey. The dimensionality of the Authenticity Scale and its measurement invariance across sex, age, and depression rate subgroups was examined with exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses; the original tripartite structure was kept. Convergent validity was tested through correlation analyses with the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, the International Positive and Negative Affect Schedule Short-Form, the Centre of Epidemiological Studies-Depression Scale, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. According to the CFA results, the structure of the Russian version differs from the original one slightly (item 1 was moved from the subscale Authentic Living to the subscale Accepting External Influence and item 4 was excluded); however, the modified factor model showed the best absolute and comparative fit statistics [CFI = 0.961, TLI = 0.949, RMSEA = 0.050 (90% CI [0.40; 0.60]) and SRMR = 0.037]. The reliability (McDonald’s Omega) of the Authenticity Scale subscales was satisfactory and ranged from 0.78 to 0.84. It was revealed that youth are more likely to have high scores on Accepting External Influence and Self-Alienation than adults. Men and women did not significantly differ on the sub-scores of Authenticity Scale. Multigroup CFA also showed that Authenticity Scale scores may be biased in people with high levels of clinical depression, in terms of the item intercepts. Authentic Living is positively connected with mental wellbeing, self-esteem, positive affect, satisfaction with life, and negatively with depressive symptoms and negative affect; reverse trends were found for Accepting External Influence and Self-Alienation subscales. The Russian version of the Authenticity Scale is a valid, reliable tool that may be recommended for use in various areas of non-clinical practice.

Inclusion

Personal authenticity is one of the most recommended opinions in the modern busy and you will switching community where anybody changes their public, financial, and you can educational standing and also identities once or twice in their lives. Is real, as on your own – such intentions and wants are very important on the emotional well being in the one another eudemonic and you can hedonic meanings (Kernis and you can Goldman, 2006; Smallenbroek mais aussi al., 2017; Sutton, 2020).

The newest Credibility Size: Recognition in the Russian Society

Personal authenticity results in some other helpful psychological phenomena, instance positive affective relationships, subjective really-becoming, large mind-admiration, mercy and you may care about-compassion, and you will mental controls (Sheldon ainsi que al., 1997; Neff and you may Suizzo, 2006; Theran, 2010; Boucher, 2011; English and John, 2013; Kifer et al., 2013; Wickham, 2013; Bochaver mais aussi al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2019; Yanchenko and you will Nartova-Bochaver, 2020). Simultaneously, it’s a shield between stress and its outcomes or good bad predictor off psychological susceptability (Goldman and you can https://kissbrides.com/tr/blog/sarisin-unlu-kadinlar/ Kernis, 2002; Satici mais aussi al., 2013). For this reason, this might be an excellent that’s really worth investigating, computing, and developing.

Within its really standard setting, authenticity can be defined as someone’s ability to end up being true to help you themselves, the characteristics, in addition to their existence trajectory. It seems to get one of the “troubling” tricky rules, however, as it is obtainable independently out-of people objective requirements and indicates a good higher coherence that have a specific individuals feelings otherwise details which might be never specific (Jones, 2010). This feature off authenticity causes it to be tough to investigation the content authenticity of the related tools, and you can, thus, most validation studies are restricted to the new examining divergent validity simply. Additionally, facts authenticity changes all over societies, and for get across-cultural analysis, a constant and legitimate software trapping the brand new key articles off authenticity will become necessary.